Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Nathan Trouve Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Trouve analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Ryan Nijboer vs Nathan Trouve Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Trouve
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 47.41% of points on their second serve, while Trouve has won 51.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 52.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Trouve has won 47.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.14% and 40.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 53.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trouve has saved 52.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 57/ 36), with Trouve winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Trouve has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.84% of matches (W/L 44/ 19), where as Trouve has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times and Trouve being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Trouve winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Trouve was at the M15 Manacor, 12-01-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Trouve have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Trouve 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Trouve 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.95 while Trouve has played against players with an average rank of 169.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trouve has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trouve has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
398
Rank
398
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Form
57% (228-174)
Career Total W/L
47% (7-8)
57% (26-20)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ryan Nijboer vs Nathan Trouve For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nijboer VS Trouve
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Nathan Trouve |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (27/43) | 64% (41/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (22/27) | 51% (21/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 52% (12/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/64) | 26% (11/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nathan Trouve
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Nathan Trouve |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (26/20) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (59/48) | 44% (4/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (528/483) | 49% (37/39) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 140 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 188 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.04 | 169.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1910/3173) | 63% (114/182) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1299/1910) | 62% (71/114) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (603/1263) | 51% (35/68) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (162/368) | 50% (10/20) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1345/3213) | 43% (71/167) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (17/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (25/45) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (8/16) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (26/21) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (26/5) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (20/5) | 0% (2/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Ryan Nijboer
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
0
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Iliyan Radulov
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Trouve Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nathan Trouve
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Trouve
Player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Trouve
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Nijboer Vs Trouve Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nijboer are available here and Trouve photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
